This was thought to be a monotypic group, but our ITS analysis suggests the taxon from western N. America is distinct, and the analysis presented by Larsson (2010, unpublished data) shows two distinct clades in N. Europe. Hygrophorus chrysodon var. cistophilus Pérez-De-Greg., Roqué & Macau is also divergent in its ITS sequence (E. Larsson, unpublished data). While specimens from the divergent H. chrysodon clades do not

differ appreciably in morphology, they occur with different hosts or are geographically disjunct and may represent different varieties or species. Hygrophorus chrysodon var. leucodon Alb. & Schwein. is thought to be a color variant, but has not been sequenced. Comments Chrysodontes was described as ‘Chrysodontini’ by Singer (1943) as a subsection of sect. Hygrophorus, following the placement by Bataille (1910). All subsequent authors also placed Chrysodonteswithin sect. Hygrophorus (Kovalenko 1989, 1999; Arnolds 1990; Aurora Kinase inhibitor Bon 1990; Candusso 1997) or as a series in subsect. Hygrophorus

(Hesler and Smith 1963). Our LSU analysis shows strong support (72 % ML BS) for placing Chrysodontes as sister to the rest of the genus Hygrophorus, and the four-gene analysis presented by Larsson (2010, unpublished data) shows sect. Chrysodontes basal while sect. Hygrophorus is the most distal in the phylogeny, making the placement by Singer and others untenable. We have therefore raised this phylogenetically supported and morphologically distinctive group to section rank. Hygrophorus [subgen. Camarophylli STK38 ] sect. Rimosi E. Larss., sect. nov. MycoBank MB804118. Type species Hygrophorus Selleck ATM Kinase Inhibitor inocybiformis A.H. Sm., Mycologia EPZ-6438 manufacturer 36(3): 246 (1944). Basidiomes dry; pileus appearing rimose from dark grayish brown fibrils on a pale ground, darker in the centre,

fibrillose veil remnants on margin; lamellae white, distant, decurrent; stipe white with dark grayish brown fibrils from veil remnants, apex white; growing with Abies and Picea. Etymology.—rimose = cracked, referring to the cracked appearance of the pileus surface. Phylogenetic support Only the analysis presented by Larsson (2010) includes H. inocybiformis. In that analysis, H. inocybiformis is the most basal member of the subg. Camarophyllus grade; there is high support (81 % MPBS) for placing H. inocybiformis as sister to the rest of the genus Hygrophorus. Support for this monotypic clade is 100 % MPBS. Species included Type species: Hygrophorus inocybiformis. The section is monotypic. Comments Hesler and Smith (1963) placed H. inocybiformis in series Camarophylli, together with a mixture of species from subg. Camarophylli and Colorati. The dry basidiomes, dull colors, and cortinoid fibrillose veil fit well in subg. Camarophylli. Subfamily Lichenomphalioideae Lücking & Redhead subf. nov. MycoBank MB804120. Type genus: Lichenomphalia Redhead, Lutzoni, Moncalvo & Vilgalys, Mycotaxon 83: 38 (2002).