“OBJECTIVE: Statistical methods that measure the independe


“OBJECTIVE: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of buy Z-IETD-FMK individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression

trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters.\n\nSTUDY DESIGN: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births.\n\nRESULTS: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100%. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2%. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of > 3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9%.\n\nCONCLUSION: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.”
“AIM: To

evaluate the anatomical causes of maturation failure and to assess clinical outcomes after the causative lesions of immature arteriovenous fistula (AVF) have been corrected by endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and radiological data from 141 patients EPZ004777 who underwent endovascular treatment for immature AVF were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes, such as the success rates and the patency rates following the procedure, were included. The variables, including patients’ age, gender, co-morbidities, fistula age, fistula type, numbers of lesions, degree of stenosis, presence of accessory veins, were analysed as the potential predictors of primary and

secondary patency. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success rates were 95.7% (135 of 141 AVFs) and 86.5% (122 of 141 AVFs), respectively. The primary and secondary selleck patency rates were 71.9% and 82.8% at 1 year, 60.1% and 82.0% at 2 years, and 54.5% and 82.0% at 3 years, respectively. By multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, stenosis of bigger than 90% was the only independent predictor for both the primary and secondary patency rates [hazard ratio (HR) 5.026, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.47-10.24, p smaller than 0.0001 for primary patency and HR 11.076, CI 1.49-82.58, p = 0.019 for secondary patency, respectively]. CONCLUSION: All immature AVFs had significant anatomical causes of failure to mature, which could be safely and effectively salvaged with endovascular treatment. A degree of stenosis bigger than 90% was an independent predictor for both the primary and secondary patency after the treatment.

Comments are closed.