g., “I get sudden feelings of panic”). A Norwegian adaptation of HADS, which has shown good psychometric properties (Mykletun, Stordal, & Dahl, 2001), was used in this study. The Cronbach’s alpha for HADS-A in the present sample was .792. Psychological hardiness was assessed using the Norwegian adaptation of the Dispositional Resilience scale (DRS-15-R; Hystad, Eid, Johnsen, Laberg, & Bartone, 2010). The DRS-15-R consists of 15 positive and negative statements. Participants are asked to indicate on a four-point Likert scale

how true or untrue each statement is relation to themselves. The statements included cover the three conceptual hardiness facets of commitment, control, and challenge.

The Cronbach’s alpha for the DRS-15-R in the present sample was .753 for the total score, and .743, .796, and .411, respectively, for the dimensions Commitment, Control, and Challenge. http://www.selleckchem.com/products/z-vad-fmk.html The data were collected as a part of a larger study on dynamic risk factors Roxadustat research buy for criminal behavior conducted in Bergen Prison. The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee for Medical Research. The ethics committee stipulated a requirement that the initial information about the project and the first request for participation had to be made by a prison official. No information is therefore available about the non-participants. All participation was voluntary and the participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study Leukotriene-A4 hydrolase at any time. The PCL-R assessment was performed by either a clinical psychologist or advanced psychology students who had all undergone intensive training in use of the instrument. The majority of the interviews were tape-recorded

to enable inter-rater reliability to be assessed. The DRS-15-R and HADS forms were administered along with other self-report measures (i.e., demography, attitudes, general health). Analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 for Macintosh. Pearson’s product-moment correlation was used in the preliminary analyses to examine the relationships between the variables. The PROCESS procedure for SPSS (Release 2.041; Hayes, 2012) was used to test the mediation models. This procedure has several advantages compared to traditional approaches to testing mediation, and it enables simultaneous testing of multiple mediators and provides bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) for the indirect effects (Hayes, 2012 and Preacher and Hayes, 2008). In each mediation model, 1000 bootstrap resamples were used to estimate the confidence intervals. Descriptive statistics and correlations between the measures are reported in Table 1. No significant correlation was found between PCL-R (total) and anxiety. Divided into the two underlying PCL-R factors, there was a marginally significant correlation between anxiety and F1 (r = −.233, p = .