3a). The observed localization was quite similar to that of the proteins involved in endocytosis, such as AoEnd4 (Higuchi et al., 2009b). Moreover, we confirmed the colocalization of AipA with AoAbp1 in A. oryzae, suggesting that AipA also plays a role in endocytosis (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, to test whether the localization of AipA was dependent on actin similar to AoAbp1, analysis using Lat B, an inhibitor of actin polymerization, was performed. After Lat B treatment, both EGFP-AipA and AoAbp1-mDsRed were dispersed into the cytoplasm,

suggesting that Ibrutinib molecular weight the localization of both proteins was dependent on actin (Fig. 3b). To analyze the function of AipA, we generated aipA disruptants in A. oryzae and then compared the growth of the control and ΔaipA strains (Fig. S3). However, we did not observe any remarkable phenotype in the ΔaipA strains compared with the control strain under several culture conditions. Moreover, the staining of hyphae with FM4-64, a fluorescent dye that

labels the endocytic pathway, showed no significant defects of endocytosis in ΔaipA strains compared with the control strain (data not shown). To further analyze the function of AipA, we generated an aipA-overexpressing strain, which expresses aipA under the control of PamyB at the niaD locus. The aipA-overexpressing strain showed retarded growth and a wider hyphal morphology (Fig. 4a and b). In S. cerevisiae, K197A and E233Q mutants of Vps4p, a AAA ATPase functioning in the formation of MVB, an endocytic organelle, have defective ATPase activity and, thus, do not function PS341 Guanylate cyclase 2C correctly (Babst et al., 1997, 1998). We determined that the ATPase domains of AipA, Sap1p, Yta6p,

and Vps4p are highly conserved (Fig. 4d). For the phenotypic analysis of mutations to the ATPase domain of AipA, strains expressing either aipAK542A or aipAE596Q, the counterpart of vps4K197A or vps4pE233Q, respectively, under control of PamyB were generated. Moreover, we also created egfp-fused WT aipA- and mutant aipA-overexpressing strains and confirmed that their growth was nearly identical to the strains overexpressing WT aipA and mutant aipA without egfp. Microscopic observation verified that there was EGFP fluorescence in most hyphae of these strains (data not shown). Furthermore, by Western blot analysis, it was confirmed that both mutant AipAs fused with EGFP were expressed as EGFP-fused WT AipA was, indicating that mutant AipAs were not degraded (Fig. 4c). In contrast to the aipA-overexpressing strain, mutated aipA-overexpressing strains did not show defective growth or aberrant hyphal morphology, suggesting that ATPase activity is essential for the function of AipA (Fig. 4a and b). To monitor the endocytic process in the aipA-overexpressing strain, we performed a time-course experiment with FM4-64.