Studies involving both outdoor and computer simulated approaches

Studies involving both outdoor and computer simulated approaches have shown that natural environments in general have a number of psychological benefits compared to urban settings. They have been shown to improve mood

(Barton and Pretty, 2010, Hartig et al., 2003, van den Berg et al., 2003 and Ulrich, 1984), increase the ability to perform cognitive tasks (Berman et al., 2008, Berto, 2005, Hartig et al., RG7422 purchase 2003, Laumann et al., 2003 and van den Berg et al., 2003) and speed up recovery after surgery (e.g. Ulrich, 1984). More specifically, aquatic or “blue” environments were preferred over green environments such as forests (Felsten, 2009 and Laumann et al., 2001) and were associated with more positive mood and relaxation (White et al., 2010 and White et al., 2013). Recent qualitative research

has also explored how families use beach visits in general for improving Buparlisib in vivo psychological and physical health (Ashbullby et al., 2013). However, there is little research on the benefits of specific environments, such as rocky shores, rather than of aquatic or natural environments in general. As well as looking at nature in a very general manner, the psychological approach has tended to overlook the effect of different activities. Many studies in this line of research simply show natural scenes passively on a computer (e.g. Berto, 2005, Felsten, 2009, Laumann et al., 2001, Laumann et al., 2003, Staats et al., 2003 and van den Berg et al., 2003) or focus on walking (e.g. Berman et al., 2008; [Study 1]; Hartig et al., 2003). The coastal environment has numerous recreational uses, which can include activities from rock pooling (exploring the pools

of water and crevices) to playing or sunbathing. Some research has considered the intensity of a particular activity, such as cycling when viewing a video of a natural scene (Barton and Pretty, 2010); yet there appears to be no research on the psychological effects of different activities in natural settings. Consequently, more research is necessary to examine the psychological wellbeing benefits1 of different activities in natural environments. In addition to the wellbeing benefits of visiting the environment, there may MRIP also be benefits on visitors’ marine awareness. Numerous studies have examined the impact of direct and indirect natural experiences using school groups and excursions (Zeppel and Muloin, 2007). For example, Cummins and Snively (2000) examined an educational programme on grade 4 pupils (age 9–10), which involved a classroom session and a field trip to sandy and rocky shores. Children’s knowledge and attitudes towards the ocean significantly increased as a consequence of this field trip. Changes in awareness have also been shown in adults, for example after visits to aquariums, marine awareness was found to increase (Adelman et al., 2000, Falk and Adelman, 2003 and Wyles et al., 2013).

Comments are closed.