cinerea, F. graminearum or R. solani. Similar results are reported previously in T. asperellum,

where deletion of TasHyd1 does not reduce in vitro mycoparasitic ability [28]. Hydrophobins are highly expressed proteins that may account for up to 10% of the total amount of secreted proteins [40, 41]. In C. rosea, deletion of both Hyd1 and Hyd3 results in a reduction of the total amount of secreted proteins. Despite this, no differences in pathogen biomass production in sterile filtered culture filtrates from single and double deletion strains are recorded. This may suggest that Hyd1 and Hyd3 do not exert Selleckchem Entospletinib a direct toxic effect on the fungal prey. The higher conidial germination rates (under certain conditions) and higher growth rates of Hyd1 and Hyd3 deletion strains may explain the reduced necrotic lesion

area, caused by B. cinerea, on A. thaliana leaves preinoculated with the mutant strains in comparison with WT preinoculated leaves. As a consequence, the C. rosea deletion strains may parasitize B. cinerea to a greater extent or simply outcompete it for space or nutrients. Hydrophobins in T. asperellum are reported to influence root surface attachment and intercellular root colonization [28]. Similarly, our results show that Hyd3 is needed for barley root colonization. Unexpectedly, deletion of Hyd1 in a ΔHyd3 background increases the root colonization ability. The exact mechanism responsible for this cannot be discerned based on the current data, but we may speculate that CHIR98014 solubility dmso it can be related to the lower conidial hydrophobicity or the lower protein secretion of the double deletion strain compared with the Hyd1 and Hyd3 single gene deletion strains. In the entomopathogenic Osimertinib mw fungus B. bassiana, reduced virulence is recorded for a Δhyd1 strain, while no effect is observed for a Δhyd2 strain. However, the effect of the Δhyd1Δhyd2 double deletion mutant on virulence is cumulative and lower than for the single Δhyd1 strain [10]. Conclusions

We identified three class II hydrophobin genes and characterized their function in the fungal biocontrol agent C. rosea. Our results showed a basal expression of all three hydrophobin genes during growth and development and under nutritional stress conditions, although Hyd1 was induced during conidiation. In addition, all three genes were upregulated during self-interaction compared to the interaction with fungal prey. Deletion of C. rosea Hyd1 and Hyd3 demonstrate the involvement of the corresponding proteins in controlling conidial germination under unfavourable conditions, and the additive contribution of Hyd1 and Hyd3 to conidial hydrophobicity. Hyd3 was further shown to influence the root colonization ability of C. rosea. Methods Fungal strains and culture Selleckchem Trichostatin A conditions C. rosea strain (WT) and mutants derived from it, B. cinerea strain B05.10, R. solani strain SA1 and F.